Saturday, August 27, 2005
When Politics Directs Theology: Three sources of error in Bishop Michael Sheridan’s 2004 Instruction to Catholic Voters
Bishop Michael Sheridan of
Error 1: Ego, bad timing and hubris
The Catholic Church in the
Law had been accused of unnecessarily multiplying the number of victims by moving sexually deviant priests from parish to parish instead of sending them for treatment. Other bishops were subsequently found to have engaged in the same practice, as though it were policy, and the Church became the target of lawsuits and late-night TV comedians. Law’s 2004 assignment as Archpriest of the Roman basilica of St. Mary Major was regarded as a Papal slap in the face by thousands of
Amidst this embarrassing environment, Bishop Sheridan decided to assert Catholic moral authority on national television. Naturally, he was frequently asked whether it was prudent for him to admonish Catholic politicians and voters over their stances on selected, sexuality-related moral issues – abortion, gay marriage – while new reports of pedophilia lawsuits and his brother bishops’ sinful administrative decisions continued to mount. His answer was always the same, “Sure, we’ve made some mistakes, but that doesn’t mean we should just shut up.”
Apparently, it does. At least, that seemed to be the opinion of 280 other American bishops. While a half dozen or so made some noise about refusing Communion to John Kerry, not one joined
Error 2: Ideological agendas do not require facts
We can never be certain whether Sheridan himself or some
We can’t know if they did, but if a consortium of ultra-conservative
However, as we continue to speculate, anyone pulling such puppet strings was faced with a s